Table of Contents
The Uniform Code of Military Justice is the code by which all of the members of the armed services of the United States must abide. When a political figure starts screaming that reminding military personnel of their legal obligations is “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH,” the alarms should be blaring in every functioning democracy. When that figure is a president, those alarms ought to be deafening.
And when the reminder in question is simply that military members must follow the Constitution and refuse to obey unlawful orders, the situation becomes even more serious. That’s exactly what the country witnessed when Donald Trump lashed out at Democrats and Senator Mark Kelly for pointing out a basic truth: the Uniform Code of Military Justice forbids following illegal commands. That’s not sedition. That’s U.S. law.
What is seditious is demanding personal loyalty from the armed forces and treating any reference to their constitutional oath as an attack. In the Republic of Cascadia, we have a name for that: authoritarian drift.
Below are seven reasons this rhetoric is unconstitutional, dangerous, and revealing of intent.
1. The Uniform Code of Military Justice explicitly forbids obeying illegal orders
Cheeto Hitler’s entire accusation of sedition collapses on contact with reality. The Uniform Code of Military Justice is the binding legal framework governing all United States service members.
Article 92 covers dereliction of duty, including the duty not to follow unlawful orders. Article 90 clarifies that obedience is required only for lawful commands. Every recruit is trained in this from day one. It is foundational. When I was in boot camp, they drilled it into our heads almost every day.
Reminding troops of this law isn’t interference. It isn’t sedition. It’s a civic responsibility. Obeying unlawful orders is the quickest way to get court-martialled.
2. The military swears allegiance to the Constitution, not the president
This is Civics 101. Back when I was in secondary school, this information was taught in middle school civics class. The oath taken by every member of the U.S. military pledges loyalty to the Constitution of the United States, not the presidency. Not a political party. Not a charismatic leader demanding personal loyalty. In other words, not to a dictator.
When Trump treats the military’s constitutional oath as disloyalty to him, he’s flipping the system upside down. That is the opposite of how American civil-military relations work.
3. Calling legal reminders “sedition” is itself seditious behavior
In a democracy, elected officials are supposed to encourage constitutional literacy, especially among the armed forces. Labeling this “sedition” is not just wrong; it’s a deliberate attempt to intimidate dissent and blur the line between loyalty to law and loyalty to a man.
That’s how strongman fascist governments behave. Not constitutional republics (and yes, a constitutional republic is a form of democracy).
4. The post only makes sense if Trump intends to issue illegal orders
If disobeying unlawful orders is a threat, then what exactly is the plan?
There is absolutely no logical reason to object to reminding troops not to follow illegal commands unless someone is expecting to give them. Trump’s outrage reveals far more than it conceals. You don’t have to be a “stable genius” to figure out that if someone gets this butthurt over the idea of our troops being told not to obey illegal orders, the only reason for that is that he’s about to issue illegal orders.
He broadcasts his intent, then gets angry when others notice.
5. Threatening death for political disagreement is unconstitutional and immoral
The First Amendment protects political speech. The Constitution forbids bills of attainder and prohibits the government from using threats of punishment against lawful political opposition. The fact that the SCROTUS (So-Called Ruler of the United States) doesn’t know that is an appalling dereliction of duty worthy of impeachment and removal from office. At this point, we should probably eliminate the 25th Amendment, as the current Republican government has demonstrated that it is useless. There’s no greater indication that a person is in violation of the United States Constitution and is therefore unfit for the office than calling for the death of their political enemies.
Claiming that public officials who quote the Uniform Code of Military Justice should face death is the kind of rhetoric that destabilizes lawful governance. It is, in fact, far closer to sedition than anything Senator Kelly said or did.
That is precisely the sort of authoritarian creep the Uniform Code of Military Justice exists to prevent.
6. The investigation of Senator Mark Kelly is naked political persecution
Kelly didn’t issue an illegal command. He didn’t encourage insubordination. He reminded service members of their oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America, not the Cheeto in Chief. The ensuing investigation instigated by Trump’s Department of Injustice is retaliation, plain and simple. It’s designed to chill dissent, punish political opponents, and condition the military to serve political fascist leaders rather than the Constitution.
7. Democracies collapse when military loyalty shifts from the law to leaders
History is not subtle about this. When leaders demand personal allegiance from the armed forces, republics dissolve. Whether it’s Caesar crossing the Rubicon or 20th-century generals staging coups, the pattern is painfully clear.
The only safeguard against the collapse of our democracy is a military bound to law, not loyalty to a cult leader. Captain Bone Spur’s attacks on the Uniform Code of Military Justice and his dishonor of our military servicemembers try to erode that separation.
The bottom line is simple: reminding the military to follow the Constitution is not sedition. Insisting that such reminders are treasonous, while demanding loyalty to an individual over the law, is profoundly dangerous. It is the true sedition. It is true treason. The Uniform Code of Military Justice exists to stop exactly this kind of slide into autocracy.
Like and Subscribe!
What do you think about the Bone Spur Beta Boi’s hatred of the Uniform Code of Military Justice? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
Don’t forget to check us out on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@republicofcascadia
You can also subscribe to our monthly newsletter using the button below!